Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The major chip manufacturers have all introduced chip multiprocessing (CMP) and simultaneous multithreading (SMT) technology into their processing units. As a result, even low-end computing systems and game consoles have become shared memory multiprocessors with L1 and L2 cache sharing within a chip. Mid- and large-scale systems will have multiple processing chips and hence consist of an SMP-CMP-SMT configuration with non-uniform data sharing overheads. Current operating system schedulers are not aware of these new cache organizations, and as a result, distribute threads across processors in a way that causes many unnecessary, long-latency cross-chip cache accesses. In this paper we describe the design and implementation of a scheme to schedule threads based on sharing patterns detected online using features of standard performance monitoring units (PMUs) available in today's processing units. The primary advantage of using the PMU infrastructure is that it is fine-grained (down to the cache line) and has relatively low overhead. We have implemented our scheme in Linux running on an 8- way Power5 SMP-CMP-SMT multi-processor. For commercial multithreaded server workloads (VolanoMark, SPECjbb, and RUBiS), we are able to demonstrate reductions in cross-chip cache accesses of up to 70%. These reductions lead to application-reported performance improvements of up to 7%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it