Real-Time Search-Driven Caching for Sensing Data in Vehicular Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Real-time search is essential for accessing specific sensing data (SD) in vehicular networks to support safe, efficient, and intelligent road services. Considering the tremendous data volume, the SD search process should be carefully devised to avoid excessive retrieval and transmission delay. To alleviate the communication and computational burden for sensing devices and the cloud server, roadside edges are adopted to cache the SD in advance. Given a short lifetime of SD, the caching scheme is required to be efficient in facilitating both the search process and uplink/downlink transmission, which is quite challenging due to the coupling of resource allocation decisions. To guarantee the search efficacy and enhance the caching resource utilization, we propose a real-time search-driven caching (RSC) paradigm to enable the cooperation among storage-constrained edges. A hierarchical indexing framework is first introduced for cached data, based on which we then devise a search utility model to quantify the expected data freshness and response delay. With the objective of maximizing the long-term search reward, the RSC problem is formulated by jointly considering the search requests and utility model. A deep-reinforcement-learning-based caching (DRLC) method is proposed to solve the problem. Specifically, an action transition module is introduced to lower the computational complexity via reducing the selection space of caching actions. Extensive simulations are carried out based on the real trace data in Creteil, France, and results show that the intelligent DRLC method can improve the real-time search performance significantly comparing to the benchmark methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".