La musique comme outil de stimulation cognitive
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Les effets de la pratique et de l’écoute musicale sur le fonctionnement cognitif et cérébral ont été grandement étudiés depuis les 20 dernières années. Les études comportementales et de neuroimagerie ont mis en évidence une importante réactivité du cerveau aux stimulations musicales et de nombreux chevauchements anatomiques et fonctionnels entre les traitements musicaux et des compétences non musicales (linguistiques, motrices et émotionnelles notamment). Parallèlement à ces travaux, d’autres études ont cherché à montrer et à expliquer des effets bénéfiques de transfert de la pratique ou de l’écoute musicale sur la cognition et la motricité, chez des sujets sains comme dans des populations pathologiques. Cette revue de littérature vise à intégrer l’ensemble de ces données pour mieux comprendre pourquoi la musique constitue un outil de stimulation cognitive avantageux et comment elle peut être utilisée dans des perspectives thérapeutiques novatrices, tout particulièrement dans le champ de la neuropsychologie cognitive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".