Influence of Articular Geometry and Tibial Tubercle Location on Patellofemoral Kinematics and Contact Mechanics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Trochlear groove geometry and the location of the tibial tubercle, where the patellar tendon inserts, have both been associated with patellofemoral instability and can be modified surgically. Although their effects on patellofemoral biomechanics have been investigated individually, the interaction between the two is unclear. The authors' aim was to use statistical shape modeling and musculoskeletal simulation to examine the effect of patellofemoral geometry on the relationship between tibial tubercle location and patellofemoral function. A statistical shape model was used to generate new knee geometries with trochlear grooves ranging from shallow to deep. A Monte Carlo approach was used to create 750 knee models by randomly selecting a geometry and randomly translating the tibial tubercle medially/laterally and anteriorly. Each knee model was incorporated into a musculoskeletal model, and an overground walking trial was simulated. Knees with shallow trochlear geometry were more sensitive to tubercle medialization with greater changes in lateral patella position (-3.0 mm/cm medialization shallow vs -0.6 mm/cm deep) and cartilage contact pressure (-0.51 MPa/cm medialization shallow vs 0.04 MPa/cm deep). However, knees with deep trochlear geometry experienced greater increases in medial cartilage contact pressure with medialization. This modeling framework has the potential to aid in surgical decision making.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".