MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206594562 · doi:10.1016/s0306-3747(20)30070-1

LG Chem plans major investment to triple its carbon nanotube production capacity

2020· article· en· W4206594562 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAdditives for Polymers · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicChemistry and Chemical Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduction (economics)Investment (military)Carbon nanotubeTonneQuarter (Canadian coin)Agricultural economicsNatural resource economicsBusinessEnvironmental scienceEconomicsNanotechnologyMaterials scienceWaste managementEngineeringPolitical scienceGeographyMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

South Korean chemicals major LG Chem has announced plans to invest around KRW65 billion (c. US$53 million) by the first quarter of 2021 to increase carbon nanotube (CNT) production capacity by 1200 tonnes/year at its Yeosu plant. Once the expansion is complete, LG Chem will have a total CNT production capacity of 1700 tonnes/year at Yeosu, more than three times higher than its current level of 500 tonnes/year. The move is in response to the high global growth rates expected for CNTs over the next few years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdditives for PolymersSame topicChemistry and Chemical EngineeringFrench-language works237,207