Propofol anesthesia concentration rather than abrupt behavioral unresponsiveness linearly degrades responses in the rat primary auditory cortex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite extensive knowledge of its molecular and cellular effects, how anesthesia affects sensory processing remains poorly understood. In particular, it remains unclear whether anesthesia modestly or robustly degrades activity in primary sensory regions, and whether such changes are linked to anesthesia drug concentration versus behavioral unresponsiveness, which are typically confounded. Here, we used slow gradual intravenous propofol anesthesia induction together with auditory stimulation and intermittent assessment of behavioral responsiveness while recording epidural electroencephalogram, and neuronal spiking activity in primary auditory cortex (PAC) of eight rats. We found that all main components of neuronal activity including spontaneous firing rates, onset response magnitudes, onset response latencies, postonset neuronal silence duration, late-locking to 40 Hz click-trains, and offset responses, gradually changed in a dose-dependent manner with increasing anesthesia levels without showing abrupt shifts around loss of righting reflex or other time-points. Thus, the dominant factor affecting PAC responses is the anesthesia drug concentration rather than any sudden, dichotomous behavioral state changes. Our findings explain a wide array of seemingly conflicting results in the literature that, depending on the precise definition of wakefulness (vigilant vs. drowsy) and anesthesia (light vs. deep/surgical), report a spectrum of effects in primary regions ranging from minimal to dramatic differences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".