Affine term structure models: A time‐change approach with perfect fit to market curves
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We address the so‐called calibration problem , which consists of fitting in a tractable way a given model to a specified term structure such as yield, prepayment or default probability curves. Time‐homogeneous affine jump diffusions (HAJD) are tractable processes but have limited flexibility; they fail to perfectly replicate actual market curves. Applying a deterministic shift to the latter is a simple but efficient solution that is widely used by both academics and practitioners. However, the shift approach may not be appropriate when positivity is required, a common constraint when dealing with credit spreads or default intensities. In this paper, we address this problem by adopting a time‐change technique. Specific attention is paid to the Cox–Ingersoll–Ross model with compound Poisson jumps (JCIR), which remains standard for modeling intensities. Our time‐changed JCIR (TC‐JCIR) is compared to the shifted JCIR (JCIR++) in various credit applications such as credit default swap (CDS), credit default swaption, and credit valuation adjustment (CVA) under wrong‐way risk (WWR). The TC‐JCIR model is able to generate much larger implied volatilities and covariance effects than JCIR++ under positivity constraints and represents an appealing alternative to the latter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it