MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206633261 · doi:10.4000/books.efr.28420

1) Medievalism in Canada

2021· book-chapter· en· W4206633261 on OpenAlexaffabout
M. J. Toswell

Bibliographic record

VenueMiddle Ages without borders: a conversation on medievalism · 2021
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European Literature and History
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedievalismHistoryAncient historyMiddle Ages

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the study of medievalism is relatively young, its central tenet holds that current responses to the Middle Ages work through a double lens, to the Middle Ages themselves by way of a mediated perception of the Middle Ages established in the nineteenth century. That is, we see the Middle Ages through a glass darkly, through the Victorian period. This perception holds for the countries of western Europe and for Commonwealth countries and the United States, and for other countries strong...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMiddle Ages without borders: a conversation on medievalismSame topicMedieval European Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207