MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206646947 · doi:10.1002/cjce.24354

Leaching of <scp>Ti</scp> and <scp>V</scp> from the non‐magnetic fraction of ilmenite‐based ore: Kinetic and thermodynamic modelling

2022· article· en· W4206646947 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Erick Max Mourão Monteiro de Aguiar, Amilton Barbosa Botelho, Heitor Augusto Duarte, Denise Crocce Romano Espinosa, Jorge Alberto Soares Tenório, Marcela dos Passos Galluzzi Baltazar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Extraction and Bioleaching
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsIlmeniteLeaching (pedology)ChlorideKinetic energyIonChemistryMaterials scienceChemical engineeringAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MetallurgyMineralogyGeologyEnvironmental chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A source of Ti and V found in Brazil contains important content of both elements and has not been explored yet. Such resources would supply the demand for the battery market (Li‐ion and redox flow), robotics, unmanned aerial vehicles, and 3D printers. The hydrometallurgical route is essential to obtain different high purity products. The goal of the present work was to study the HCl leaching of Ti and V from the non‐magnetic fraction of ilmenite‐based ore. The effects of solid–liquid ratio, NaHF 2 , Fe 0 , and chloride ions were evaluated. The optimized conditions were the solid–liquid ratio of 1/6–1/12 and NaHF 2 of 10 wt.% for 4 h under reducing leaching. Kinetic modelling fitted better for the chemical reaction model. The activation energy was 14.5, 15.4, and 15.5 J/mol for Ti, V, and Fe, respectively. No improvement was obtained as the concentration of chloride ions increased.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score0.529

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicMetal Extraction and BioleachingFrench-language works237,207