MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Recent highlights from GENIE v3

2021· article· en· W4206662978 on OpenAlexaff
Luis Alvarez-Ruso, C. Andreopoulos, Adi Ashkenazi, Christopher Barry, S. R. Dennis, S. A. Dytman, H. Gallagher, S. Gardiner, Walter T. Giele, Robert Hatcher, O. Hen, Libo Jiang, I. Kakorin, Konstantin S. Kuzmin, A. Meregaglia, V. A. Naumov, Afroditi Papadopoulou, M. Roda, V. S. Syrotenko, Júlia Tena Vidal, J. Wolcott, N. Wright, M. Kabirnezhad, Narisoa Vololoniaina

Bibliographic record

VenueePubs (Science and Technology Facilities Council, Research Councils UK) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsH2020 European Research CouncilU.S. Department of EnergyHigh Energy PhysicsScience and Technology Facilities CouncilGeneralitat ValencianaEuropean Regional Development Fund
KeywordsNeutrinoMilestonePhysicsCore (optical fiber)Physics beyond the Standard ModelComputer scienceParticle physicsGeographyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The release of GENIE v3.0.0 was a major milestone in the long history of the GENIE project, delivering several alternative comprehensive neutrino interaction models, improved charged-lepton scattering simulations, a range of beyond the Standard Model simulation capabilities, improved experimental interfaces, expanded core framework capabilities, and advanced new frameworks for the global analysis of neutrino scattering data and tuning of neutrino interaction models. Steady progress continued following the release of GENIE v3.0.0. New tools and a large number of new physics models, comprehensive model configurations, and tunes have been made publicly available and planned for release in v3.2.0. This article highlights some of the most recent technical and physics developments in the GENIE v3 series.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0980.079

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations92
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueePubs (Science and Technology Facilities Council, Research Councils UK)Same topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207