Dual-Anonymous Off-Line Electronic Cash for Mobile Payment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mobile devices have become near-ubiquitous tools in our daily lives. Following this trend, mobile commence is developed rapidly which in turns stimulates interests in mobile payment. Some prominent examples include Google’s Wallet, WeChat Pay, and Apple Pay. Most of these technologies, however, are designed for users to be able to pay conveniently to the business. In other words, they are designed with the business to user model in mind. Besides, an active network connection with an external payment server is required either from payer or payee during transaction. Our work intends to supplement existing solutions, which allows payment to be made in an off-line and dual-anonymous manner. In doing so, a dual-anonymous off-line electronic cash scheme is proposed by utilizing BBS+ signature. The feature of our scheme is dual-anonymous payment, which means that both the payer and the payee in any transaction cannot be identified even all other users and the payment server collude. Through security proof and performance analysis, we also demonstrate that the security of the proposed scheme can be reduced to standard assumptions and it is suitable for applications in mobile commerce.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".