MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206676816 · doi:10.1097/cce.0000000000000607

Brief Report: Rapid Clinical Recovery From Critical Coronavirus Disease 2019 With Respiratory Failure in a Pregnant Patient Treated With IV Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide

2022· article· en· W4206676816 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Explorations · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Canadian institutionsNeuroRx Research (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVasoactive intestinal peptideCoronavirusRespiratory systemRespiratory failureCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PeptidePeptide hormoneSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Aviptadil, a synthetic form of human vasoactive intestinal peptide, has entered clinical trials to treat critical coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia with respiratory failure. Vasoactive intestinal peptide protects the lung against a broad array of injuries by binding to the vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor 1 receptor of alveolar type II cells, the cells that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 binds to. As the role of Aviptadil in treating pregnant patients with critical coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia is unknown, the authors report successful treatment in such a patient who is ineligible for phase 3 trials of Aviptadil. CASE SUMMARY: Under an open-label Food and Drug Administration-approved Expanded Access Protocol NCT04453839, a 32-year-old female patient Gravida 6 Para 4 at 27-week gestation, body mass index 42.5 kg/m 2 , admitted to the ICU of a quaternary care hospital with critical coronavirus disease 2019 was treated in January 2021 and followed for 4 months post-ICU admission. Standard of care included remdesivir, methylprednisolone, enoxaparin, and inhaled epoprostenol. In addition, the patient received three successive 12-hour IV infusions of Aviptadil at 50/100/150 pmol/kg/hr escalating doses, per randomized clinical trial NCT04311697. Human subjects’ protection was overseen by the Institutional Review Board of the Houston Methodist Hospital. The patient was enrolled in the treatment and was given informed consent approved by the Food and Drug Administration and the Institutional Review Board. Data on the patient was incorporated based on her consent for de-identified data to be used in research given at the time of hospital admission in a manner approved by the Institutional Review Board (PRO00025607). Baseline inflammatory markers, arterial blood gases, radiologic imaging, oxygen requirements, Pa o 2 /F io 2 , continuous fetal monitoring at baseline, throughout the patient’s treatment with the investigational drug, and throughout the patient’s hospital course. CONCLUSION: The rapid clinical improvement seen in this patient treated with IV vasoactive intestinal peptide is consistent with the theory that vasoactive intestinal peptide protects the alveolar type II cell, ameliorates cytokine storm, and improves oxygenation in acute lung injury. This specific role of vasoactive intestinal peptide in the lung may be vital to combating the lethal effects of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. In addition, the role of vasoactive intestinal peptide in the human maternal-fetal interface suggests that vasoactive intestinal peptide is a safe treatment of severe coronavirus disease 2019 respiratory failure during pregnancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care ExplorationsSame topicCOVID-19 Impact on ReproductionFrench-language works237,207