MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206679651 · doi:10.31234/osf.io/rkhng

Born-Open Data for jsPsych

2021· preprint· en· W4206679651 on OpenAlexaff
Denis Cousineau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTimelinePlug-inUploadComputer scienceOpen dataFunction (biology)World Wide WebPrime (order theory)Open sourceProgramming languageSoftwareBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Born-Open Data is a framework whereby experiments are conceived from the start as making the data openly accessible. This framework was first described in Rouder, 2016, and an actual implementation for E-Prime 2.10 was provided by Cousineau, 2020. Herein, we provide an implementation for jsPsych. It consist in a plugin for jsPsych which can be inserted anywhere in the experiment's timeline and a function called upon completion of the experiment. The data are then uploaded transparently and automatically to a GitHub repository where they are immediately and openly accessible to the research community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.699

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.010
Open science0.0060.012
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2090.184

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207