MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

[RETRACTED] Big Alert:- Power CBD Gummies (Is CBD Help or Harm) Elite Power CBD Gummies In 2022 v1

2022· preprint· en· W4206685506 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eagle Hemp CBD Gummies

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicE-commerce and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEliteHarmPower (physics)Political scienceLawPoliticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[RETRACTED] Availability (USA)https://dietcbdmart.com/go-powercbdgummies_US Availability (Canada)https://dietcbdmart.com/go-powercbdgummies_CA Availability (UK)https://dietcbdmart.com/go-powercbdgummies_UK Official Press Release http://ipsnews.net/business/2022/01/18/elite-power-cbd-gummies-bears-shocking-update-is-power-cbd-gummies-scam-or-legit/ Other Links: https://plarium.com/forum/en/mech-arena/702_game-discussion/611623_news-alert---eagle-cbd-cbd-gummies-big-report/ https://mymediads.com/articles/96021?new_advert=true https://www.youthkiawaaz.com/2022/01/news-2022-elite-power-cbd-gummies-what-why-result-cost-reviews/? https://www.provenexpert.com/customer-reviews-elite-power-cbd-gummies-power-cbd-gummies-reviews/?mode=preview

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.332
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicE-commerce and Technology InnovationsFrench-language works237,207