MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206690629 · doi:10.31219/osf.io/t8xqs

KEBIJAKAN MONETER DALAM PERSPEKTIF EKONOMI ISLAM

2021· preprint· en· W4206690629 on OpenAlexaff
Ray Dwiki Syahputra

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Finance and Communication
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonetary policyEconomicsIslamPerspective (graphical)Value (mathematics)Order (exchange)Economic stabilityMonetary economicsMacroeconomicsFinanceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of the rate of economic growth in a region can be said to be the economic growth that is formed through various types of economic sectors that occur indirectly which describes the occurrence of levels of economic growth. in order to achieve high but stable economic growth, monetary policy is needed. The objective of monetary policy is to achieve and maintain the stability of the rupiah value. This objective is as stated in Law no. 23 of 1999 concerning Bank Indonesia, as amended by Law no. 3 of 2004 and Law no. 6 of 2009 in article 7. The purpose of this journal is to know monetary policy from an Islamic perspective. This is interesting to discuss because there are fundamental differences between modern monetary policy and monetary policy in an Islamic economic perspective

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.722
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIslamic Finance and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207