Bibliographic record
Abstract
Situated in the middle of Canada's prairie region, Saskatoon is the largest city in the province of Saskatchewan. Nestled on the meandering South Saskatchewan River, Saskatoon has many natural features that make it an attractive place to call home. The warm, long summer days, green, clean spaces, and a variety of social and cultural events contribute to active living, social engagement, and community participation. Saskatoon offers safe, friendly neighbourhoods, a variety of housing options, excellent educational opportunities, public and accessible transit services, increasingly accessible buildings and services, and a range of health and community services. Winter poses challenges for all residents, especially older adults who face safety issues related to icy and cold conditions and resulting in reduced opportunities for social connectedness. The 2016 Canadian Census lists the population of Saskatoon's Census Metropolitan Area (CMA) as 295,095, 10.9% of whom are Indigenous people. The CMA's population grew 12.5% between 2011 and 2016 – far outpacing the national growth rate of 5%. Population growth was due primarily to immigration related to Saskatoon's rapid economic expansion. Like most cities in Canada, Saskatoon has grown outward from its historic core into mixed-development suburbs. Most older adults live in these car-dependent communities. Saskatoon's Nutana Suburban Centre has the highest density of seniors in Canada. This model of suburban development poses many challenges for citizens as they age, often forcing unwanted moves in order to access needed supports and services. In 2016, 13.5% of the Saskatoon population was age 65 or older. The older adult population is culturally and socially diverse and consists of multiple generations with vastly differing characteristics, needs, and resources. The most rapidly growing group are those 85 years of age and older. The Age-Friendly Saskatoon Initiative This vignette is informed by the voices of hundreds of older adults who participated in the Saskatoon Council on Aging (SCOA)-led Age-Friendly Saskatoon Initiative (AFSI) between 2011 and 2016. Beginning in 2009, a group of older adult SCOA volunteers (authors included) became increasingly concerned about the lack of public policy focused on the unique needs of the aging population. SCOA, a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting positive aging for all, decided to seek the opinions of older adults in Saskatoon. The goal was to promote a community conversation that would lead to changes in attitudes about aging and older adults and provide direction on how to create a more age-friendly city.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.305 | 0.046 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".