MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206692839 · doi:10.1002/nag.3333

Shear strain dependent amplification function of earth dam‐flexible canyon system by the hybrid FEM‐SBFEM technique

2022· article· en· W4206692839 on OpenAlexafffund
Alireza Yaseri, Jean‐Marie Konrad

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDam Engineering and Safety
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFinite element methodCanyonNonlinear systemStructural engineeringCrestBoundary value problemEngineeringGeologyMathematicsMathematical analysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The finite element method (FEM) is a powerful tool for the nonlinear modeling of dynamic problems. In the present work, the equivalent linear method (EQL) has been implemented into the FEM. For stratifying the radiation damping condition and rigorously modeling canyon as an elastic unbounded domain, the scaled boundary finite element method (SBFEM) was utilized. The FEM‐SBFEM technique, wherein FEM is coupled with SBFEM, has been extended to take into consideration the effect of earth dam material nonlinear behavior. It was observed that the nonlinear behavior greatly affects the natural frequency, the amplification function (AF), and peak crest acceleration of the earth dam located in canyons. The effects of canyon geometry and flexibility on the nonlinear behavior were examined, and it was seen that by increasing the flexibility of the canyon, the effect of nonlinearity was decreased. The El Infiernillo dam was modeled by 3D proposed technique, and a comparison of the crest AF obtained by the proposed method with the recorded data shows the accuracy of the methodology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in GeomechanicsSame topicDam Engineering and SafetyFrench-language works237,207