Microwave Space-Time-Modulated Metasurfaces
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>Over the past decade, static metasurfaces have proved to be low-profile and efficient apparatuses for transformation of electromagnetic waves. However, such metasurfaces are restricted by their reciprocal and time- and frequency-invariant responses. To overcome these restrictions, space-time-modulated metasurfaces have recently been introduced for versatile, reciprocal/nonreciprocal, and frequency translation of electromagnetic waves. These are capable of changing both the momentum and energy of the incident wave and provide functionalities that are far beyond the capabilities of conventional static and reciprocal metasurfaces. This Perspective provides a discussion on the unique functionalities of a microwave space-time-modulated metasurface. In particular, we review various techniques that have been recently used for the realization of metasurfaces introducing spatiotemporal decomposition, scattering and diffraction, digital coding, nonreciprocal transmission, serrodyne frequency translation, pure frequency conversion, parametric wave amplification, and multifunctional operations. Although the paper focuses on microwave space-time metasurfaces, the described concepts can inspire realization of their optical counterparts. </p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it