Driver Drowsiness Detection by Employing CNN and Dlib
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Every year thousands of people lose their life due to road accidents. One of the main reasons for these accidents is driver drowsiness. In driver drowsiness, the driver slept while driving, which causes the road accident, especially on the long routes. Driver fatigue and micro sleep while driving caused the fatal accident and death of human beings. To overcome this problem, we are implementing a technique in which we capture the image of the driver. After capturing the image of the driver, we process driver images to detect driver drowsiness. For the processing of the driver image, we are using two different techniques with each other. In the first technique, we are using the Dlib for image drowsiness detection by detecting that driver’s eyes are closed and the driver is yawning. In the second technique, we used CNN for the detection of yawning and the eyes of the driver are closed or not and predict driver drowsiness. After implementing the two techniques we combine the output of both techniques. After combining both techniques we test the system, and it gives us very good results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".