Bibliographic record
Abstract
ENTEROSTOMAL THERAPY NURSES (CAET) The Wonders of Advancing Wound, Ostomy and Continence Care with CAET The Canadian Association for Enterostomal Therapy Nurses (Nurse Specialists in Wound, Ostomy and Continence Care) are pleased to announce the upcoming 29th annual conference, 'The Wonders of Advancing Wound, Ostomy and Continence Care' taking place 27-30 May 2010 at the Niagara Fallsview Casino Resort, in Niagara Falls, Ontario.An International, Interprofessional line up of leading speakers and educators in wound, ostomy and continence care along Canadian expert Enterostomal Therapy Nurses will bring you the latest information on critical wound assessment, lower limb management, peristomal skin complications, continence and ethics in wound care.Our innovative 'handson' workshops are 'not to be missed'.There are LIMITED spaces for the conference workshops so early registration for the workshops will guarantee participation.For further information, please go to www.caet.caor call the CAET National Office at 1-888-739-5072.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.338 | 0.280 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".