MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206743337 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2021-0182

Beyond exploding balloons — bringing the science of chemistry to the public

2022· article· en· W4206743337 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Jacqueline Farrell, Alexander S. Wahba

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicVarious Chemistry Research Topics
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityDawson College
FundersOffice of ScienceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsOutreachChemistryCuriosityChemistry educationScientific literacyScience educationMathematics educationPsychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is a personal account of the inception and work of the award-winning McGill Chemistry Outreach Group by two of its founding members. This team of graduate students, staff, and faculty helps promote science literacy, curiosity, and critical thinking, while making chemistry accessible to the public. The McGill Chemistry Outreach Group also serves as a good example of how to prepare students and staff in communicating chemistry to the public through formal training. In doing so, outreach is beginning to be defined not only in terms of its obvious impact on members of the public, but also as an explicit part of a student’s professional training.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicVarious Chemistry Research TopicsFrench-language works237,207