MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206748514 · doi:10.4000/books.pum.6122

Introduction

2012· book-chapter· fr· W4206748514 on OpenAlexaff
Monique Tardif

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks · 2012
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsInstitut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-PinelUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le projet de réaliser un ouvrage collectif sur la délinquance sexuelle des mineurs témoigne des préoccupations que la société, les professionnels et les législateurs accordent à ces jeunes. Dans le passé, les cas d’abus sexuels perpétrés par des mineurs faisaient rarement l’objet d’études ou de mesures sociojuridiques particulières, et devenaient encore moins les sujets d’un traitement spécialisé. Certains considéraient d’ailleurs que de tels comportements étaient imputables aux réactions d’...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.330
Threshold uncertainty score0.956

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3300.156

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses de l’Université de Montréal eBooksSame topicPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207