Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study aims to determine the characteristics of religious tendencies of Generation Z in the focus of Generation Theory. For this purpose, in the study it was analyzed that people from Generation Z with different socio-economic levels and living in different cities of Turkey were interviewed and their religious tendencies were determined. In this study, semi-structured interview methods from qualitative research methods were used to collect data. In the determining of the sample group, criterion sampling was preferred, which it is from one of the purposive sampling methods. Participants pay more importance to the external meanings of religion. They understand religion as limited to a few specific dimensions. Participants mostly define religion in terms of the benefits it provides to them. The frequency of going to places of worship is lower for Generation Z. The participants do not have a routine visit to worship places. They do not consider themselves religious and feel positive emotions after the prayers. The participants care about obtaining religious knowledge and mostly research on the internet. Religion does not affect the choice of friends of Generation Z.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it