177Lu-FAPI Therapy in a Patient With End-Stage Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: A 52-year-old woman with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT, which demonstrated malignancy recurrence in the surgical bed with multiple metastatic lesions, more extensive on 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT. The patient was a candidate for therapy with 177Lu-FAPI-46 due to high uptake of lesions in 68Ga-FAPI-46 images and no other available therapeutic option. Posttreatment 177Lu-FAPI-46 scans showed rather rapid washout of the radiopharmaceutical from tumoral lesions. This case report suggests that, although 68Ga-FAPI-46 is a promising agent for tumor imaging, 177Lu-FAPI-46 may not be an optimal compound for theranostic applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".