MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Water Bodies

2012· other· en· W4206780330 on OpenAlex
Daniel Caissie, Joël Chassé, Yerubandi R. Rao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of Environmetrics · 2012
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstuaryHydrology (agriculture)Environmental scienceSurface runoffEntrainment (biomusicology)STREAMSHydraulicsDrainage basinWater balanceEcologyOceanographyGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Water bodies play a vital role in our daily lives from water supplies to recreational activities including many ecological benefits. This article provides an overview of most important aspects and processes of lakes, rivers, and estuaries. Lake processes are initially described in terms of morphological, light, and thermal characteristics. Then the heat balance and water movement are presented as they influence mixing and other important lake processes. Rivers and streams are described in terms of catchment hydrology as well as water movements (river hydraulics). As such, water availability and losses are described as well as the type of flow within channels that affects all aspects of the river environment. Estuaries are where both freshwater and saltwater meet. Accordingly, they are also influenced by many factors such as the freshwater runoff, Coriolis force, entrainment, and gravity currents among others, and these factors play a role in the mixing and stratification of estuaries. Therefore, the type of estuaries and related processes are briefly described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1780.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it