MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4206796225 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3522

WALLABY pilot survey: H <scp>i</scp> gas disc truncation and star formation of galaxies falling into the Hydra I cluster

2021· article· en· W4206796225 on OpenAlexafffund
T. Reynolds, Barbara Catinella, L. Cortese, T. Westmeier, G. R. Meurer, Li Shao, Danail Obreschkow, Javier Román, L. Verdes‐Montenegro, Nathan Deg, Helga Dénes, Bi‐Qing For, D. Kleiner, B. Koribalski, K. Lee-Waddell, C. Murugeshan, Se–Heon Oh, J. Rhee, Kristine Spekkens, L. Staveley‐Smith, Adam R. H. Stevens, J. M. van der Hulst, Jing Wang, O. Ivy Wong, Benne W. Holwerda, A. Bosma, Juan P. Madrid, Kenji Bekki

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of CanadaQueen's University
FundersPlanetary Science DivisionAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónScience Mission DirectorateH2020 European Research CouncilSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryUniversity of California, Los AngelesJet Propulsion LaboratoryMinistry of Science and ICT, South KoreaEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemNational Central UniversityNational Research Foundation of KoreaQueen's UniversityNational Research FoundationEuropean CommissionMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieUniversity of EdinburghAustralian Research CouncilSpace Telescope Science InstituteUniversity of MarylandCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesScience and Industry Endowment FundLos Alamos National LaboratoryJohns Hopkins UniversityCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationGordon and Betty Moore FoundationMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesQueen's University BelfastMinistry of Science and TechnologyDurham UniversitySmithsonian InstitutionNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCalifornia Institute of TechnologyUniversity of Hawai'iNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsGalaxy clusterGalaxyStar formationDwarf galaxyVirgo ClusterAstronomyBrightest cluster galaxyCluster (spacecraft)Luminous infrared galaxyRADIUS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We present results from our analysis of the Hydra I cluster observed in neutral atomic hydrogen (H i) as part of the Widefield ASKAP L-band Legacy All-sky Blind Survey (WALLABY). These WALLABY observations cover a 60-square-degree field of view with uniform sensitivity and a spatial resolution of 30 arcsec. We use these wide-field observations to investigate the effect of galaxy environment on H i gas removal and star formation quenching by comparing the properties of cluster, infall, and field galaxies extending up to ∼5R200 from the cluster centre. We find a sharp decrease in the H i-detected fraction of infalling galaxies at a projected distance of ∼1.5R200 from the cluster centre from $\sim 85{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ to $\sim 35{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$. We see evidence for the environment removing gas from the outskirts of H i-detected cluster and infall galaxies through the decrease in the H i to r-band optical disc diameter ratio. These galaxies lie on the star-forming main sequence, indicating that gas removal is not yet affecting the inner star-forming discs and is limited to the galaxy outskirts. Although we do not detect galaxies undergoing galaxy-wide quenching, we do observe a reduction in recent star formation in the outer disc of cluster galaxies, which is likely due to the smaller gas reservoirs present beyond the optical radius in these galaxies. Stacking of H i non-detections with H i masses below $M_{\rm {HI}}\lesssim 10^{8.4}\, \rm {M}_{\odot }$ will be required to probe the H i of galaxies undergoing quenching at distances ≳60 Mpc with WALLABY.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→