Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet ouvrage est consacré à la figure professionnelle du caupo, qui, dans l’Antiquité romaine, fournissait contre paiement le gîte et le couvert aux voyageurs de passage. L’étude, centrée sur l’Occident, met en lumière l’évolution de l’activité de ces aubergistes romains entre la période médio-républicaine et le début de l’Antiquité tardive, à partir d’une approche croisée des textes et des vestiges. Avec l’expansion de l’imperium Romanum et l’essor des mobilités qui l’accompagne, le rôle des aubergistes, bien que déconsidéré, s’avère toujours plus crucial pour garantir la fluidité des déplacements des hommes et des marchandises au quotidien. L’enquête propose d’analyser les comportements économiques et commerciaux des caupones, ainsi que l’encadrement juridique particulièrement sévère auquel leur activité était soumise. Elle se penche sur les identités des professionnels de l’accueil et de leurs clients et discute des représentations, parfois stéréotypées, dont ils faisaient l’objet. Cet ouvrage s’intéresse enfin aux sociabilités qui prenaient naissance dans les auberges de l’Occident romain, des mégapoles de l’empire aux routes les plus reculées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Other About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Not applicable | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Other About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no | Theoretical or conceptual | low |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".