MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206852181

i-Berlioz: Interactive Computer-Aided Orchestration with Temporal Control

2018· preprint· en· W4206852181 on OpenAlexaff
Eduardo Reck Miranda, Aurélien Antoine, Myriam Desainte‐Catherine

Bibliographic record

VenuePEARL (University of Plymouth) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHuman Motion and Animation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrchestrationComputer scienceControl (management)Human–computer interactionArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces the beta version of i-Berlioz, an interactive\nCAO system that generates orchestrations from verbal timbre descriptors. This\nsystem relies on machine learning models for timbre classification and generative orchestration, and methods and tools to write and execute interactive scenarios. The text details the two main parts of i-Berlioz: its generative and exploratory engines, illustrated with an example of i-Berlioz operational processes. Such a system would ultimately aid the composition of musical form based\non timbre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.601
Threshold uncertainty score0.853

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePEARL (University of Plymouth)Same topicHuman Motion and AnimationFrench-language works237,207