MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206900735 · doi:10.1109/tps.2022.3140413

Active Control of Secondary Current Profile Applied on an Offset Dual-Coil Ignition System

2022· article· en· W4206900735 on OpenAlexafffund
Qingyuan Tan, Hua Zhu, Xiao Yu, Ming Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Plasma Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersCanada Foundation for InnovationOntario Innovation TrustScience and Engineering Research CouncilUniversity of WindsorFord Motor Company
KeywordsIgnition systemOffset (computer science)Electromagnetic coilControl systemDual (grammatical number)Computer scienceCurrent (fluid)Control theory (sociology)Automotive engineeringElectrical engineeringControl (management)EngineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, an active feedback control strategy is introduced to control an offset dual-coil ignition system. By adjusting the offset between the charging durations for the ignition coils, the control strategy can improve the integrity of the secondary current level against the disturbance of external air flow. Experiments are designed to demonstrate the performance improvement of offset dual-coil ignition system after the proposed control strategy has been implemented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.525
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Plasma ScienceSame topicCombustion and Detonation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207