Multi-Stage Memory Efficient Strassen's Matrix Multiplication on GPU
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prior implementations of Strassen's matrix multiplication algorithm on GPUs traded additional workspace in the form of global memory or registers for time. Although Strassen's algorithm offers a reduction in computational complexity as compared to the classical algorithm, the memory overhead associated with the algorithm limits its practical utility. While there were past attempts at reducing the memory footprint of Strassen's algorithm by compromising parallelism, no prior implementation, to our knowledge, was able to hide the workspace requirement successfully. This paper presents an implementation of Strassen's matrix multiplication in eUDA, titled Multi-Stage Memory Efficient Strassen (MSMES), that eliminates additional workspace requirements by reusing and recovering input matrices. MSMES organizes the steps involved in Strassen's algorithm into five stages where multiple steps in the same stage can be executed in parallel. Two additional stages are also discussed in the paper that allows the recovery of the input matrices. Unlike previous works, MSMES has no additional memory requirements irrespective of the level of recursion of Strassen's algorithm. Experiments performed with MSMES (with the recovery stages) on NVIDIA Tesla V100 GPU and NVIDIA GTX 1660ti GPU yielded higher compute performance and lower memory requirements as compared to the NVIDIA library function for double precision matrix multiplication, cublasDgemm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".