MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206924311 · doi:10.1002/adts.202100278

A Novel Theoretical Model Development and Simulation of Melt‐Electrospinning Using Kane's and Udwadia–Kalaba Methods

2022· article· en· W4206924311 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Theory and Simulations · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFiberMechanicsViscoelasticityJet (fluid)KinematicsDiscretizationMaterials scienceElectrospinningSimulationPhase (matter)TrajectoryControl theory (sociology)Mechanical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsClassical mechanicsMathematicsComposite materialMathematical analysisPolymerArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A novel analytical model development and simulation of melt‐electrospinning process is presented. Unconstrained equations of motion for the description of a discretized melt‐electrospun fiber are formulated using Kane's method. The motions of the spinneret and the collector plate are also incorporated into the kinematics formulation to simulate direct writing and three‐dimensional printing scenarios. Constraints describing viscoelastic joints in the system and the phenomenon of the melt‐electrospun fiber adhering to the collector plate are implemented using the Udwadia Kalaba method. Rotational viscoelastic elements are introduced to mimic the dampening of the whipping motion observed in the unstable region. A novel algorithm is devised to continuously run the simulation with no limit on the total duration and phase transitions. System responses such as fiber diameter, collection size, fiber elongations, and jet speeds are monitored for changes in control parameters including applied voltage, collector distance, and flowrate. The results demonstrate close agreement with experimental observations in the literature. The jet starts relatively straight on the onset of its trajectory and develops subtle whipping motion as it advances toward the collector plate. Reduction in the amplitude of the whipping motion is observed once the free end of the fiber adhered to the collector plate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.462
Threshold uncertainty score0.574

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it