MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206925103 · doi:10.1353/jmm.2021.0006

How Film Magazines Shape Movie Industries the World Over

2021· article· en· W4206925103 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paola Banchero

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œjournal of magazine media · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMovie theaterDigitizationFilm studiesMedia studiesArtSociologyArt historyVisual artsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

How Film Magazines Shape Movie Industries the World Over Paola Banchero (bio) Mapping Movie Magazines: Digitization, Periodicals and Cinema History. Daniel Biltereyst and Lies Van de Vijver (eds.). Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. 405 pp. $119.99 hardcover. Going to the movies is more than just about film itself. It is about the cultural, economic, and social aspects of the cinematic experience, from the movie house to the conditions that exist for the film to be made, distributed, and received. How do we consider these elements of film, and in what ways are they reflected in other media? Cinematic history has been forging a new path into this territory for about fifteen years as scholars investigate aspects of film that might have once seemed peripheral—particularly focused on audience experiences—and reconsider underutilized movie magazines for this purpose. Some of the scholars interested in this newer ground met at an international conference in 2015 on digitization, movie magazines, and audience research. From that meeting was born the recently published book Mapping Movie Magazines: Digitization, Periodicals and Cinema History. It is part of Palgrave Macmillan’s Global Cinema series. The book is edited by Daniel Biltereyst, professor of film and media history and director of the Centre for Cinema and Media Studies (https://www.ugent.be/ps/communicatiewetenschappen/cims/en) at Ghent University, Belgium, and by Lies Van de Vijver, a postdoctoral fellow at the same center. Reflecting the international nature of the original conference, the book includes chapters on the movie magazine markets in the United States, Britain, France, Canada, South Africa, the Netherlands, and Chile. As such, it affords readers opportunities to consider the differences between countries that tend to be receivers of cultural products, such as [End Page 102] Chile, and countries whose movie industries export films globally, such as France and Great Britain. These nodes of intercultural differences underlie much of the content of the book, which invites readers to compare film magazines’ editorial systems in a range of countries. The book’s thirteen chapters (not including the editors’ introduction) are organized into three sections. The first one, “Magazines, Digitization and Cinema Historiography,” opens with a chapter about Variety, the longest-running magazine about the movie industry. The chapter’s authors made issues of Variety from 1905 to 1949 freely accessible and searchable online through a collaboration with the Media History Digital Library (https://lantern.mediahist.org/), Library of Congress Packard Campus, and the University of Wisconsin–Madison. Digging through the digitized archives with keyword searches is speedy and efficient, but the authors recognize that this method alone lacks context, as they explain and consider some of the intellectual and data-related dilemmas of using digitized archives. The chapter further offers insights into how Variety—the go-to publication for film history—made strategic editorial and advertising decisions. Although at its inception Variety simply covered vaudeville, burlesque, and film, over time it became more than an observer of the entertainment media of its day; it was also a participant in the film industry. This chapter and many others are useful to magazine-media scholars in explaining how to use magazine digital archives, which are increasingly coming online. For example, the second chapter in the book uses the same Variety archive through the Media History Digital Library to consider how American Jews of the early twentieth century used “picture palaces,” high-end vaudeville venues, and theater during Passover, Rosh Hashanah, and the end of Yom Kippur. The authors analyzed the archive with computational survey methods and also conducted more traditional research by doing distant and close readings of the source material. The book’s second part is called “Magazines, the Film Industry, and the Cultural Economy.” It includes a chapter about how Hollywood embarked on a gatekeeping campaign to try to police fan magazines and the sometimes-scandalous material they printed. Another chapter in this section serves as a biography of Ray Lewis, a pioneering editor of the Canadian Moving Picture Digest for thirty-six years. The third part is titled “Authors, Stars, and Fans.” This section includes an intriguing study of a Chilean magazine called Ecran, which flourished [End Page 103] in Chile in the 1940s as the country...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.009
Scholarly communication0.0230.009
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œjournal of magazine mediaSame topicCinema and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207