A Crosscutting Three-Modes-Of-Operation Unique LiDAR-Based 3D Mapping System Generic Framework Architecture, Uncertainty Predictive Model And SfM Augmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The need for 3D mapping is on the rise to meet the requirements of a growing and diverse group of end-users. Existing 3D mapping systems, which have been classified according to the mode of operation as stationary, mobile and aerial, tend to serve one mode of operation only and are considered cost-prohibitive for many end-users. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have experienced rapid growth since their introduction and their usage in 3D mapping is likewise accelerating at a rapid pace. This dissertation presents the design, development and implementation of a LiDAR-based generic 3D mapping system that can be used in the three mapping modes (stationary, mobile and UAV-based). The system provides direct georeferencing capabilities through optimized selected multimodal sensors. A fundamental part of this dissertation is the smart integration of the 3D mapping system components both on the hardware and software levels, along with a new mapping scheme that enables platform-independent deployment ability. This research project also presents a rigorous non-linear uncertainty predictive model for the generic developed system and introduces a very low-cost variant of the system to be used in stationary and handheld mode. The developed multipurpose mapping system is tested in different environments for the three modes of operation, demonstrating its practicality, versatility and ease of deployment. To maximize the ease of deployment for diverse end-users, careful consideration is given to the mapping system components so that the developed system is ultra-lightweight, compact, and multipurpose. Additionally, this dissertation proposes a colorization workflow to make use of available optical imagery in the colorization process of the LiDAR point cloud. Lastly, the study compares two different 3D mapping approaches: 3D LiDAR-based mapping and a low-cost optical-based 3D structure from motion (SfM) workflow. The comparison is achieved by performing a real-world case study of digital surface model (DSM) generation by the two aforementioned approaches. Real-world testing that includes qualitative and quantitative validation against accurate state-of-the-art high-end LiDAR equipment proves the successful design, development and deployment of the developed crosscutting LiDAR-based 3D mapping system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".