MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206934786 · doi:10.37394/23209.2021.18.15

An ANN and Virtual Vector Function Approach for the Computation of the Inverse Kinematics of Redundant Manipulators

2021· article· en· W4206934786 on OpenAlexafffund
Shahnaz Habibkhah, René V. Mayorga

Bibliographic record

VenueWSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWorkspaceInverse kinematicsKinematicsComputer scienceComputationForward kinematicsArtificial neural networkFunction (biology)Task (project management)Set (abstract data type)Control theory (sociology)MathematicsMathematical optimizationAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceRobotEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Paper presents an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) method for the solution of the Inverse Kinematics (IK) of redundant manipulators. This problem normally has an infinite number of solutions. Several conventional approaches based on numerical methods have been proposed over the years. However, it is well known that ANN implementations for the solution of the problem for redundant manipulators are inefficient since they lead to inaccurate solutions. The main issue on the implementation of ANN solutions is that an attempt is made on mapping a relation from a given number of variables in the manipulator task space to a larger number of variables in the joint space. This Paper proposes the inclusion of a virtual vector function in the task space to “complete” it; so that the number of variables in the task space is at least equal to the number of variables in the joint space. Here, the proposed approach is successfully tested on a 3 DOF planar redundant manipulator performing four diverse target trajectories inside the manipulator’s workspace. Additionally, in order to define the target trajectories, some manipulator’s links limitations are considered and some conditions are set for the target trajectories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONSSame topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207