P163 Abdominal X-ray: an invaluable tool in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Intravenous steroids (IV-S) remain the cornerstone of treatment of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis (ASUC). However, one-third of these patients are refractory to this treatment. Several indices have been developed to predict the failure of IV-S for ASUC, using clinical data at day 3 of treatment. However, indices able to predict IV-S failure based on admission data are lacking. Methods A retrospective analysis of all consecutive hospital admissions due to ASUC, in a Portuguese tertiary centre, between February 2007 and April 2021 was performed. Only patients receiving IV-S for at least 3 consecutive days were included in this study. IV-S non-response was defined as the need for a second-line therapy or surgery. The following clinical data was collected from each patient: age, gender, disease duration, Montreal disease extension, previous ASUC, previous and on admission medical therapies (oral mesalazine, rectal mesalazine, oral steroids, immunosuppressants and monoclonal antibodies), fever on admission and weeks of symptoms’ worsening before admission. The following parameters on admission were also registered: C-reactive protein, albumin level, hemoglobin, leucocytes count, platelets count, Mayo endoscopic subscore and presence of transverse colonic dilatation on abdominal X-ray ≥5.5 cm. Univariate analysis was used to identify predictive factors of IV-S failure. Results 68 patients (64.7% female), with a mean age of 40.4 (±16.2) years, were included in this study. 9 patients (13.2%) did not respond to IV-S therapy. On univariate analysis, only transverse colonic distension on X-ray was more frequent in IV-S non-responders (33.3% vs 6.8%, p=0.04). Conclusion Clinical data on admission, including previous medication, analytical parameters and endoscopic activity were not predictive of IV-S refractoriness in this population. However, abdominal X-ray showed to be useful to predict the need for a rescue therapy. These findings highlight, in one hand, the need of larger studies to identify on admission predictors of IV-S refractoriness and, in other hand, the importance of abdominal X-ray, in patients admitted due to ASUC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".