MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206957029 · doi:10.5267/j.ijdns.2021.12.007

Tourist visiting interests: The role of social media marketing and perceived value

2022· article· en· W4206957029 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Juliana Juliana, Bunga Aditi, Rocky Nagoya, Wisnalmawati Wisnalmawati, Ita Nurcholifah

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Data and Network Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Marketing and Social Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial mediaTourismStructural equation modelingData collectionSample (material)MarketingValue (mathematics)Social media marketingUploadAdvertisingPsychologyBusinessSociologyGeographyComputer scienceDigital marketingMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research is intended to measure the influence of Social Media Marketing which uploads tourist destinations in Banten Province with interest in visiting mediated by perceived value. The research method uses a hypothesis testing model and uses a cross sectional model, where data is collected completely within a certain time. The study uses a convenience sampling technique, where the sample members are respondents who are easy to find, and this convenience makes data collection more effective and efficient since it saves time and costs. The sample in this study were 290 tourists who had visited Banten Province. The technique of collecting data in this study used an online questionnaire, data analysis using structural equation modeling (SEM) using SmartPLS 3.0 software. The study concluded that there was a significant relationship between Social Media Marketing and Perceived Value. There was a significant relationship between Social Media Marketing and Visiting Interests. There was a significant relationship between Perceived Value and Visiting Interests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score0.802

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Data and Network ScienceSame topicDigital Marketing and Social MediaFrench-language works237,207