MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Carleton-Cisco IoT Testbed: Architecture, Features, and Applications

2021· article· en· W4206978292 on OpenAlexaffabout
Zied Bouida, Ismael Al-Shiab, Yousef Rafique, Abdallah Jarwan, Manishkumar Moorjmalani, Sajib Kumar Kuri, Mohamed Ibnkahla

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTestbedComputer scienceArchitectureComputer architectureInternet of ThingsEmbedded systemComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Carleton-Cisco Internet of Things (IoT) testbed is being built at Carleton University’s IoT Lab. Hosting diverse applications, the testbed adopts a layered approach composed of four layers: Sensing, Edge, Fog, and Cloud layers. The IoT testbed is distributed over multiple sites at Carleton University’s Campus and the City of Ottawa. In this paper, we first present the architecture and the features of the testbed. Then, we give an overview of the applications running on the testbed and their underlying techniques and protocols. In particular, we highlight the use of Edge computing and data analytics in selected applications. We also present the testbed’s deployment challenges and the proposed solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2021 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207