MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206986715 · doi:10.1021/acsomega.1c06067

Electronic Structure of Single-Atom Alloys and Its Impact on The Catalytic Activities

2022· review· en· W4206986715 on OpenAlexafffund
Ziyi Chen, Peng Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Omega · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersGovernment of SaskatchewanWestern Economic Diversification CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Research Council CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsElectronic structureAtom (system on chip)Valence (chemistry)CatalysisFermi levelMaterials scienceChemical physicsDensity functional theoryNanotechnologyChemistryComputational chemistryComputer sciencePhysicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single-atom alloys (SAAs) are promising materials for heterogeneous catalysis due to their unique structure and electronic properties. SAAs have active sites narrowed down to the single-atom level, which combines the advantages of alloy materials and single-site catalysts. Given the unique structural feature of SAAs, their electronic properties can be more flexibly tailored than for their monometallic counterparts, which can be used to effectively control their catalytic activities. One interesting feature commonly observed for SAAs is the lower density of state (DOS) near the Fermi level than their bulk references. Comparing with results for their monometallic bulk reference, the most noticeable electronic property change in SAAs is the narrowing of the valence band, which gives them free-atom-like character. Moreover, the d-band position of both single atoms and their host metals can show a pronounced shift. These changes of electronic structure in SAAs could largely affect the adsorption behavior of adsorbates during the catalytic processes. Close examination of the relationship between electronic structure and catalytic activity can provide useful guidance for rational design of new catalysts with improved performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations72
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS OmegaSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207