Adaptive estimation for functional data: Using a framelet block‐thresholding method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article considers a framelet block‐thresholding method for estimating mean and covariance functions from discretely sampled noisy observations. Estimated convergence rates are established for all types of sampling schemes. In particular, the results reveal a phase transition phenomenon related to the number of observations on each curve. It is shown that the proposed procedures are adaptive in automatically adjusting the smoothness properties of the underlying mean and covariance functions. In contrast, theoretical results for other smoothing methods hold in the setting where smoothness parameters are assumed to be known, since the regularization parameters of estimators that depend on smoothness properties need to be chosen carefully. Simulation studies are provided to offer empirical support for the theoretical results. A comparison with other methods demonstrates that the proposed method outperforms in adaptivity. An application to a real dataset is also provided to illustrate the proposed estimation procedure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it