MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4206996269 · doi:10.3390/jrfm15020047

Diffusion on the Peer-to-Peer Network

2022· article· en· W4206996269 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Julien Riposo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of risk and financial management · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOpinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePeer-to-peerTheoretical computer scienceContext (archaeology)GraphGraph theoryDiffusionTRACE (psycholinguistics)Distributed computingMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a peer-to-peer complex environment, information is permanently diffused. Such an environment can be modeled as a graph, where there are flows of information. The interest of such modeling is that (1) one can describe the exchanges through time from an initial state of the network, (2) the description can be used through the fit of a real-world case and to perform further forecasts, and (3) it can be used to trace information through time. In this paper, we review the methodology for describing diffusion processes on a network in the context of exchange of information in a crypto (Bitcoin) peer-to-peer network. Necessary definitions are posed, and the diffusion equation is derived by considering two different types of Laplacian operators. Equilibrium conditions are discussed, and analytical solutions are derived, particularly in the context of a directed graph, which constitutes the main innovation of this paper. Further innovations follow as the inclusion of boundary conditions, as well as the implementation of delay in the diffusion equation, followed by a discussion when doing approximations useful for the implementation. Numerous numerical simulations additionally illustrate the theory developed all along the paper. Specifically, we validated, through simple examples, the derived analytic solutions, and implemented them in more sophisticated graphs, e.g., the ring graph, particularly important in crypto peer-to-peer networks. As a conclusion for this article, we further developed a theory useful for fitting purposes in order to gain more information on its diffusivity, and through a modeling which the scientific community is aware of.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of risk and financial managementSame topicOpinion Dynamics and Social InfluenceFrench-language works237,207