Secure Aggregation in Federated Learning via Multiparty Homomorphic Encryption
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A key operation in federated learning is the aggregation of gradient vectors generated by individual client nodes. We develop a method based on multiparty homomorphic encryption (MPHE) that enables the central node to compute this aggregate, while receiving only encrypted version of each individual gradients. Towards this end, we extend classical MPHE methods so that the decryption of the aggregate vector can be successful even when only a subset of client nodes are available. This is accomplished by introducing a secret-sharing step during the setup phase of MPHE when the public encryption key is generated. We develop conditions on the parameters of the MPHE scheme that guarantee correctness of decryption and (computational) security. We explain how our method can be extended to accommodate client nodes that do not participate during the setup phase. We also propose a compression scheme for gradient vectors at each client node that can be readily combined with our MPHE scheme and perform the associated convergence analysis. We discuss the advantages of our proposed scheme with other approaches based on secure multi-party computation. Finally we discuss a practical implementation of our system and compare the performance of our system with baseline approaches that do not perform encryption.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it