Epigenetic landscape of drug responses revealed through large-scale ChIP-seq data analyses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Elucidating the modes of action (MoAs) of drugs and drug candidate compounds is critical for guiding translation from drug discovery to clinical application. Despite the development of several data-driven approaches for predicting chemical-disease associations, the molecular cues that organize the epigenetic landscape of drug responses remain poorly understood. RESULTS: With the use of a computational method, we attempted to elucidate the epigenetic landscape of drug responses, in terms of transcription factors (TFs), through large-scale ChIP-seq data analyses. In the algorithm, we systematically identified TFs that regulate the expression of chemically induced genes by integrating transcriptome data from chemical induction experiments and almost all publicly available ChIP-seq data (consisting of 13,558 experiments). By relating the resultant chemical-TF associations to a repository of associated proteins for a wide range of diseases, we made a comprehensive prediction of chemical-TF-disease associations, which could then be used to account for drug MoAs. Using this approach, we predicted that: (1) cisplatin promotes the anti-tumor activity of TP53 family members but suppresses the cancer-inducing function of MYCs; (2) inhibition of RELA and E2F1 is pivotal for leflunomide to exhibit antiproliferative activity; and (3) CHD8 mediates valproic acid-induced autism. CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed approach has the potential to elucidate the MoAs for both approved drugs and candidate compounds from an epigenetic perspective, thereby revealing new therapeutic targets, and to guide the discovery of unexpected therapeutic effects, side effects, and novel targets and actions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".