MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4207002297 · doi:10.1161/hyp.70.suppl_1.p159

Abstract P159: MicroRNA Profiling in Small Resistance Arteries of Hypertensive Patients With or Without Chronic Kidney Disease

2017· article· en· W4207002297 on OpenAlexaff
Ku-Geng Huo, Júlio C Fraulob-Aquino, Chantal Richer, Asia Rehman, Marie Briet, Pierre Boutouyrie, Mark L. Lipman, Daniel Sinnett, Pierre Paradis, Ernesto L. Schiffrin

Bibliographic record

VenueHypertension · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related molecular mechanisms research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKidney diseaseMedicinemicroRNABlood pressureInternal medicineRNA extractionRenal functionRNAGene expressionNon-coding RNAFold changePathologyGeneBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Hypertension (HTN) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are global health disorders that are epidemiologically associated. Vascular injury is an early manifestation in HTN and contributes to CKD. It is characterized by endothelial dysfunction and vascular remodeling that are accompanied by gene expression changes. MicroRNAs (miRs) are important non-coding RNA regulators of gene expression. Dysregulation of miRs has been shown in HTN and CKD, but their implication in vascular injury remains unclear. We aimed to identify differentially expressed (DE) miRs in small arteries of HTN and CKD human subjects to get further insight into pathophysiological molecular mechanisms in these conditions. Methods and Results: Normotensive, HTN (systolic blood pressure (BP) > 135 mm Hg or diastolic BP of 85-115 mm Hg with BpTRU) and CKD subjects (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60mL/min/m 2 ) (n=15-16) were studied. Small arteries were dissected from a subcutaneous gluteal biopsy under RNAse free condition and used for total RNA extraction with the mirVana miR isolation kit. cDNA libraries were prepared using the TruSeq small RNA prep kit and the TruSeq stranded total RNA prep kit, and sequenced by Illumina HiSeq 2500. DE miRs and DE mRNAs ( P <0.05) were identified using EdgeR, which found 3 up- and 6 down-regulated miRs, as well as 134 up- and 149 down-regulated mRNAs uniquely associated with HTN, 42 up- and 39 down-regulated miRs, as well as 743 up- and 348 down-regulated mRNAs uniquely associated with CKD, while 2 up-regulated miRs and 101 up- and 75 down-regulated mRNAs were found in both groups. Target Scan was used to predict DE miR targets in the DE mRNAs. Enrichment analysis showed that the HTN-associated DE miR-targeting DE mRNAs were highly enriched in gene ontology (GO) terms involved in peptidase activity, mitochondrial activity and immune response ( q <0.01), while the CKD-associated DE miR-targeting DE genes were highly enriched in GO terms involved in tube formation, fibroblast proliferation and EGF response ( q <0.001). Conclusions: DE miRs were identified in small arteries of HTN and CKD patients. Enrichment analysis in DE miR-targeting DE mRNAs revealed GO terms that could be linked to different degrees of vascular changes in HTN and CKD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHypertensionSame topicCancer-related molecular mechanisms researchFrench-language works237,207