MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4207003199 · doi:10.4000/interfaces.4208

Challenging the Selfie: Perfect Skin by Chatonsky

2021· article· en· W4207003199 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Claire Larsonneur

Bibliographic record

VenueInterfaces · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSelfieMeaning (existential)Representation (politics)The artsSocial mediaVisual artsPerceptionArtAestheticsComputer scienceMedia studiesSociologyEpistemologyPhilosophyWorld Wide WebLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the series Perfect Skin launched in 2015, Gregory Chatonsky, a French Canadian artist, ran an AI programme on the more than 5000 Tumblr and Instagram selfies posted by Kim Kardashian, to create distorted and serial representations of the celebrity which were then reproduced through a series of media: photo, video, textiles, ceramics, VR. Chatonsky challenges the genre of the selfie on several accounts. He highlights issues such as scale and exposure within the infoglut. Using algorithms also enables him to trigger cognitive and artistic shifts: from the visual arts to mathematics, from representation to data, from creative control to chance, from recognition to perceptual aporia, from social media to the gallery. These distorted and serialised images, “organes sans corps” to take up Deleuze’s famous concept, may pertain to a regime of meaning based on affect, as defined by Brian Massoumi, rather than on mimesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0090.013
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterfacesSame topicSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207