MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4207020527 · doi:10.1108/oxan-db258567

Canada climate plan will wrong-foot Conservatives

2021· other· en· W4207020527 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEmerald expert briefings · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvestment (military)Natural resource economicsPeak oilPlan (archaeology)Climate changeEconomyGeographyBusinessEconomicsDevelopment economicsAgricultural economicsEconomic growthPolitical sciencePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance The plan eyes net-zero emissions by 2050, under the Paris climate agreement, but risks further alienating Canada’s western, natural-resource-dependent provinces as well as rural Canadians and economic conservatives. The plan comes as Canada battles COVID-19 and ahead of an expected pre-term election in the coming months. Impacts Support for small-scale nuclear reactors will increase, particularly in areas currently reliant on diesel for most electricity. Petrol prices in rural Canada will rise, stirring discontent towards the Liberals. The northern Alberta oil sands’ decline will accelerate, meaning reduced investment and job losses. Canada-US action to put a sunset date on the future production of petrol-powered vehicles is possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEmerald expert briefingsSame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207