MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ANALYSIS OF PHYSICAL AND MATHEMATICAL MODELS OF STRESSED MAGNETOANISOTROPIC STRUCTURES

2020· article· en· W4207036936 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIzvestiya of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Power Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsGeomechanica (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCartesian coordinate systemSpherical coordinate systemElasticity (physics)Polar coordinate systemMathematical modelPolarMathematical structureMathematical analysisClassical mechanicsMathematicsPhysicsGeometryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The analysis of physical and mathematical models of stressed magnetoanisotropic structures (NMAS) is considered, in which physical models are presented in the form of a ferromagnetic rectangular plate or a quarter of a ring element (SE) in an electromagnetic fi eld under force. Their mathematical models are described by systems of differential equations of theories of electromagnetic fi elds, ferromagnetism and elasticity in Cartesian, cylindrical and spherical coordinates. It is shown that the picture in NMAS in spherical polar coordinates is most fully refl ected, which is confi rmed experimentally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.679
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it