DA-IMRN: Dual-Attention-Guided Interactive Multi-Scale Residual Network for Hyperspectral Image Classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep learning-based fusion of spectral-spatial information is increasingly dominant for hyperspectral image (HSI) classification. However, due to insufficient samples, current feature fusion methods often neglect joint interactions. In this paper, to further improve the classification accuracy, we propose a dual-attention-guided interactive multi-scale residual network (DA-IMRN) to explore the joint spectral-spatial information and assign pixel-wise labels for HSIs without information leakage. In DA-IMRN, two branches focusing on spatial and spectral information separately are employed for feature extraction. A bidirectional-attention mechanism is employed to guide the interactive feature learning between two branches and promote refined feature maps. In addition, we extract deep multi-scale features corresponding to multiple receptive fields from limited samples via a multi-scale spectral/spatial residual block, to improve classification performance. Experimental results on three benchmark datasets (i.e., Salinas Valley, Pavia University, and Indian Pines) support that attention-guided multi-scale feature learning can effectively explore the joint spectral-spatial information. The proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art methods with the overall accuracy of 91.26%, 93.33%, and 82.38%, and the average accuracy of 94.22%, 89.61%, and 80.35%, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".