MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4207062750 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab232.094

DOP55 Long-term outcomes after histologic-endoscopic mucosal healing: Results from the UNIFI study in Ulcerative Colitis

2022· article· en· W4207062750 on OpenAlexaff
Rupert W. Leong, Bruce E. Sands, Laurent Peyrin‐Biroulet, Colleen Marano, Yi Miao, James Izanec, Brian G. Feagan, David T. Rubin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUlcerative colitisGastroenterologyGranulation tissueMaintenance therapyColonoscopySurgeryInternal medicineEndoscopyColorectal cancerChemotherapyWound healingDiseaseCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background In the UNIFI study of ustekinumab (UST) in ulcerative colitis (UC), patients who achieved histo-endoscopic mucosal healing (HEMH; ie, both histologic and endoscopic improvement of mucosa) after induction had higher clinical remission and corticosteroid-free clinical remission rates through 1 year than those who achieved either histologic or endoscopic improvement alone.1 Here, we report the effect of achieving HEMH after induction on long-term symptomatic outcomes through 3 years. Methods Patients who were in clinical response after 8 wks of IV induction with UST 130mg or ~6mg/kg (wk 8 responders) were randomized to maintenance treatment with SC UST 90mg q12w or q8w on entry into maintenance. Those who were not in clinical response to the initial UST dose at wk8 but achieved response at wk16 after receiving a single SC dose of UST 90mg at wk8 (wk16 responders) entered maintenance receiving SC 90mg q8w. After 44 wks of maintenance treatment, patients were given the option to continue in the long-term extension. HEMH was defined as achieving both endoscopic improvement (Mayo endoscopy subscore ≤1) and histologic improvement (neutrophil infiltration in <5% of crypts, no crypt destruction, and no erosions, ulcerations, or granulation tissue; based on the Geboes score). Patients with insufficient data for histologic evaluation at the end of induction were excluded. Symptomatic remission was defined as a Mayo stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 and a Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Results Of the 438 patients who were wk8 or wk16 responders to UST induction and received UST maintenance, 116 (26.5%) achieved HEMH after induction, 30 (6.8%) achieved endoscopic improvement without histologic improvement (EI), and 106 (24.2%) achieved histologic improvement without endoscopic improvement (HI). Patients who achieved HEMH after induction had higher symptomatic remission and corticosteroid-free symptomatic remission rates at wks92 and 152 than those with EI or HI; the differences were statistically significantly greater at wk152, while they were only numerically greater at wk92 (Table). The differences were primarily driven by patients with HEMH after induction being more likely to maintain symptomatic remission between wks92 and 152, than those with EI or HI alone. Symptomatic remission and corticosteroid-free remission rates decreased between wks92 and 152 in patients with EI or HI only. Conclusion Patients with UC who achieved HEMH after induction with UST were more likely to maintain symptomatic remission and corticosteroid-free symptomatic remission between 2 and 3 years of maintenance treatment than those who achieved EI or HI alone. Reference 1. K Li, et al. Poster 1008. Presented at UEGW 2019. October 22, 2019. Barcelona, Spain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207