Investigating The Effects Of Pulsed Radiofrequency Therapy In The Blocking Of Action Potentials In Nerves
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<div>Radiofrequency (RF) currents (pulsed or continuous mode) are used as a treatment modality for chronic pain management. This is achieved by blocking sensory nerves’ ability to propagate pain signals. In this thesis, it was proposed that pulsed RF (PRF) therapy can block action potential propagation, and that when used in clinical settings, deliver thermal doses below the threshold for</div><div>thermal damage to nerves. A neurophysiology system with stimulating and reading electrodes was used to study earthworm nerves before and after PRF therapy. It was shown that 60% of earthworms in the high-voltage-group treated with bipolar PRF experienced a block in action</div><div>potential propagation. Computer simulations of the electrical field and heating patterns were created, experimentally validated, and after determining a threshold thermal dose for nerve damage, it was shown that for C6 medial branch nerve PRF therapy the temperature at the nerve was not high enough to cause thermal damage.</div>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".