An Implication of Cultural, Racial and Ethnic Plurality in Margaret Laurence's -The Diviners
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Margaret Laurence, one of the foremost women writers of Canada meticulously strives to reconstruct the lost identities of the cultural groups of Africa and Canada in the last decades of the twentieth century. Lawrence's Manawaka series for instance, is the deliberation of the cultural groups of indigenous, colonial and immigrants. These varied cultural groups constitute the ‘Canadian Multiculturalism’ as its unique cultural identity. Margaret Laurence rigorously endeavors to portray a naked and realistic picture of Canadian multiculturalism in an imaginary fictional work. The present novel reveals the fact of the multicultural groups have meticulously striving for getting social recognition by means of their rebellion against the atrocity of racial discrimination and experiences of the barbaric disturbances among the ethnic groups. It is all about the nineteenth-century Scottish settlers in the region of Red River and the indigenous Metis. It is also the representation of a woman's quest for having a comprehensive understanding of human community. The novel sheds the light on the lost historical impressions of the indigenous group such as the Metis, in the folktales and songs, and their confrontation with the Sutherlanders for survival.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.039 | 0.035 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".